Jeremy Bates vs Neil Broad Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Bates vs N. Broad

Jeremy Bates

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Neil Broad

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Bates 1 - 0 Broad

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jeremy Bates winning 2 and Neil Broad winning 0. The last match between Jeremy Bates and Neil Broad was at the Johannesburg, 13-11-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Jeremy Bates getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bates	1
Broad	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R4) Johannesburg(11-13-89)

Stats

Jeremy Bates

Neil Broad

J. Bates vs N. Broad H2H Profile

J. Bates	Stats	N. Broad
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
41.87% (157-218)	Career Total W/L	56.16% (41-32)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Bates vs N. Broad Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jeremy Bates has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Neil Broad has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jeremy Bates, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Neil Broad has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jeremy Bates has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Neil Broad has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jeremy Bates has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Neil Broad winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jeremy Bates has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 25/ 48). Neil Broad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 30/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
Player level: In the last year, Jeremy Bates has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Neil Broad has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jeremy Bates winning 1 times and Neil Broad being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jeremy Bates winning 2 and Neil Broad winning 0. The last match between Jeremy Bates and Neil Broad was at the Johannesburg, 13-11-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Jeremy Bates getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jeremy Bates has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Neil Broad has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jeremy Bates has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Neil Broad has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jeremy Bates has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Neil Broad has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jeremy Bates vs Neil Broad Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Bates vs N. Broad H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Bates	Stats	N. Broad
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Bates Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 24-06-1996
R1 Nicolas PereiraN. Pereira	L	6-2 6-3 6-4	Stats
Queen's Club - 10-06-1996
R1 Jared PalmerJ. Palmer	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Shanghai - 29-01-1996
R1 Jeff TarangoJ. Tarango	L	6-4 7-6(3)	Stats
Beijing - 16-10-1995
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Albert ChangA. Chang	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Broad Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Durban - 29-03-1993
R1 Wayne FerreiraW. Ferreira	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Johannesburg - 30-03-1992
R1 Kevin UllyettK. Ullyett	L	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
Wimbledon - 25-06-1990
R2 Christian BergstromC. Bergstrom	L	4-6 7-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
R1 Lawson DuncanL. Duncan	W	6-4 6-2 7-6	Stats
Australian Open - 15-01-1990
R1 Claudio PistolesiC. Pistolesi	L	5-7 6-4 6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Bates vs N. Broad Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Bates	Stats	N. Broad
41.87% (157/218)	YTD Win/Loss	56.16% (41/32)
43.21% (417/548)	Sets Win/Loss	53.41% (94/82)
47.38% (4382/4866)	Games Win/Loss	49.10% (868/900)
44.44% (68/85)	Hard Win/Loss	55.56% (30/24)
34.25% (25/48)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
38.33% (23/37)	Indoor Hard W/L	100.00% (5/0)
46.07% (41/48)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (6/6)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
303.36	Average Opponent Rank	349.12
36.84% (21/36)	Slam W/L	33.33% (3/6)
16.67% (2/10)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
60.00% (9/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
42.41% (95/129)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (4/12)
44.62% (29/36)	Challenger W/L	72.34% (34/13)
43% (129/303)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (37/62)
38% (26/69)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (3/9)
48% (22/46)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
49% (56/115)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (12/20)
74% (164/122)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (42/36)
24% (164/40)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (42/6)
16% (211/34)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (30/4)